Early in the recovery, there was a lot of debate about what “shape” the recovery would take. There were letters, such as V, U, W, L, and K, and shapes, such as a swoosh or a square root sign. The great recovery shape debate has fizzled but still matters—for what is ahead for the economy, for the still raging inflation debate, for the policy debates taking place in Washington, and, of course, for the markets. And it turns out these debates center on a recovery shape that was not getting a whole lot of attention last summer: the Z-shaped recovery.
The general shape of the recovery so far has been mainly driven by three forces: the COVID-19 pandemic, which provided a massive external shock to the economy that really had nothing to do with its natural cyclicality, historic fiscal and monetary stimulus put in place to get us through that shock, and the rapid development of several effective vaccines. So far, these forces have given us a historically anomalous, deep V-shaped recovery: a steep drop and a surprisingly quick and robust recovery. The recovery has been sufficiently quick that the U.S. topped the pre-recession peak in economic output last quarter, although we are still likely below where we would have been had pandemic not occurred.
The job market recovery has been slower. From 2011 to 2019, the economy created about 2.3 million jobs each year. Even 2019, the weakest year over that span, brought in more than 2 million jobs—a very strong number so deep into an expansion. Then in March and April 2020, the economy shed over 22 million jobs in just two months, with more than 20 million in April 2020 alone. We have regained just over 17 million of those jobs, but that still leaves us over 5 million jobs short of the pre-pandemic peak.
The recovery has been slowed over the last several months by the spread of the highly contagious Delta variant and still sub-optimal vaccine rates. Behavioral changes in response to Delta, additional government restrictions, and strains on healthcare systems in regions with low vaccination rates have all taken their tolls, as has the impact of Delta on some East Asian trade partners, extending supply chain bottlenecks.
The slowdown from higher growth levels and recent data disappointments can make it easy to lose perspective on what those revised levels mean. For a sense of scale, the top three quarters of the last expansion were Q2 2014, Q3 2014, and Q4 2014, when the economy grew at an annualized rate of 5.2%, 4.7%, and 4.6% respectively. The prospective “disappointing” growth of the final two quarters of 2021 could still be near or above the peak growth level of the last expansion. In other words, despite a downward revision in GDP the recovery still has a lot of momentum that may extend well into 2022.
A Z-shaped recovery is when the economy bounces back quickly and GDP jumps above its potential early in the recovery before either settling back into the trend again or even falling back into recession—and there has not been one in a long time.
Potential GDP growth is the rate at which the economy can grow sustainably without overheating. When an economy is growing at full potential, it is using most of its labor pool and industrial capacity. An economy can grow faster, but then it comes at a cost. The true rate of potential GDP growth is difficult to know in practice, but nevertheless where it is can be consequential. Growth above potential usually brings with it additional inflationary pressure. In addition, further stimulus, whether fiscal or monetary, comes with increased risk when the economy is growing above potential. Markets implicitly monitor potential GDP, as well, as it helps determine the risk and outlook of current growth rates.
In the 1950s through the early 1970s, recoveries quickly pushed GDP up above potential, contributing to a shorter cycle of economic expansion and contraction. Since the 1970s, the economy has tended to run below potential for much longer. For the second half of 2021 and 2022, many of the ongoing debates around the merits of additional fiscal stimulus, the risks from inflation, and when the Fed should start raising rates are fueled by assumptions on where the economy is relative to potential GDP, and what it means. Due to the steepness of the recovery, we may see a Z-shaped recovery for the first time in decades.
The main assumptions in estimating potential are the two basic components of GDP growth: the growth in hours worked, which basically reflects the growth in the work force and growth in productivity, the improvement in what the average worker produces in an hour. Right now, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that by the end of the decade, productivity at potential will grow about 1.4% a year and the labor force will grow about 0.3% a year, with a majority of that coming from population growth via immigration since demographics are now limiting labor force growth from current population dynamics. Put those together and you get 1.7% potential real GDP growth. The CBO estimate is higher for the next couple of years at 2.1% due to post-recession adjustments.
Based on CBO estimates of potential GDP, consensus economic growth would take us above potential in 2022, and we have not seen such a fast move to that level in a long time. Interpreting the jump above potential is challenging given the unusual cause of the recession. Still, if correct, it would probably mean that we should be cautious about an oversized stimulus package; that the Fed may find it more challenging to find the sweet spot for withdrawing stimulus; that inflation may be stickier than expected (although it is likely to settle down); and that market gains may be more muted next year. But looking at the type of shock the economy was hit with, if we get a Z-shaped recovery, it does not imply the type of short cycle we saw in the 1950s. It also likely points to stagflation being off the table. The inflation risk may be there, but the economy is not stagnating – it is booming. The risk isn’t stagflation—it is too much of a good thing.
GDP growth should moderate next year but context remains important. Widespread vaccination distribution has helped extend the V-shaped recovery seen to date—even with the added threat from the Delta variant—and has supported the handoff from stimulus bridging a pandemic-driven income shortfall back to workforce growth supporting rising incomes. The economic recovery has been slowed but continues to exhibit momentum. Going into 2022, the key concern is not the shortfall in the economic recovery but making sure the transition back to the private economy leading the recovery is supported—but not unnecessarily fueled.
The views expressed are provided for information only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities or investment products. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you consult your financial advisor.
The economic forecast set forth in this presentation may not develop as predicted, and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.
Data provided by LPL Financial and the Congressional Budget Office.
Indexes are unmanaged statistical composites and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and do not reflect fees, expenses,