Various polls show former Vice President Joe Biden comfortably in the lead in the 2020 presidential race. However, in some battleground states the race appears to be quickly tightening. Influential states like Ohio and Pennsylvania may even be a coin toss at this point.
Not surprisingly, approval ratings can play a large part in forecasting the overall percentage of the votes in an election. Only two presidents have lost reelections since the Great Depression: Jimmy Carter and George H. W. Bush. Not surprisingly, both had low approval ratings leading up to the elections. If the people do not approve of the job the President is doing, then that President may not earn a second term. Recent Gallup polls suggest that President Donald Trump’s approval rating is 43% (Rasmussen has him much higher). Using regression analysis of previous elections, this indicator means less than half of the two-party vote. Trump received less than half of the popular vote in 2016, but still won the election because he had more than 270 votes in the Electoral College. Nonetheless, the polls currently favor Biden, and this race appears to be his to lose.
How well specific “Biden stocks” have done could be another clue that a Biden victory may be around the corner. Strategas Research Partners created a basket of stocks likely to benefit from either a Trump or Biden presidency, and the Biden portfolio has done extremely well lately. Areas like green energy and solar have experienced huge moves before this election, while defense companies and financials— considered friendly to Trump—have not performed as well.
Also, recessions have been reelection killers. Since the Great Depression, there have been four recessions within two years of an election, and the incumbent party lost every single time. The 1924 election with President Calvin Coolidge was the last time the incumbent party candidate won when there had been a recession ahead of the election.
Most Washington insiders think Biden has at least a 60% chance of winning this election, with many thinking the odds are much higher. However, there is a chance things could be much closer, and here is why.
- Gross domestic product (GDP) is set for a huge surge in the third quarter, with the Atlanta Federal Reserve GDPNow estimating a jump of 35.3% when the number is released October 29. That would be the largest quarter-over-quarter increase ever and would bring the average for the previous two quarters to a respectable 2.1%. That is not bad considering GDP was down more than 31% in the second quarter of 2020. Regression analysis of previous elections indicates a 2.1% GDP print means 51.9% of the two-party vote, exactly what President Barack Obama received in 2012. Note that the only president who had negative-GDP growth ahead of the election was Carter, who lost his reelection bid in 1980. Since we have had both a recession and a resurgence, these indicators cancel each other out.
- Stocks are strong. Historically, the stock market is an indicator of who will be in the White House. In 20 of the past 23 elections (87%), the S&P 500 Index has indicated who would win. When stocks have been higher the three months before the election, the incumbent party usually has won, and if they were lower, the incumbent party usually lost. Remember 2016 when nearly everyone thought former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would win? The S&P 500 fell ahead of the election and signaled a change in party. Since August 3, the S&P 500 is up 5.6%, which would support Trump in this election.
- Incomes are rising. It also turns out that if people are making more money, they tend to reelect presidents. The higher real (inflation-adjusted) per capita disposable income growth has been from January through October of an election year, then the higher the two-party vote an incumbent president has received. This statistic has increased 3.4% so far this year, and regression analysis suggests this could amount to 57% of the two-party vote based on previous elections. Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush both had weak income growth (less than 1%), and they both lost their reelections, while Presidents Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson, and Ronald Reagan all saw nice wage growth, and all won comfortably. The issue with this analysis for the current election is that the CARES Act included stimulus checks to many Americans, as well as enhanced unemployment insurance, which have inflated incomes despite the high unemployment rate. We would put this signal in the favor of Trump, but with an asterisk next to it. It is also why the most recent stimulus package has become so politicized.
- The US dollar is weak. A weaker US dollar before the election historically has signaled an incumbent party victory. Like when stocks are higher, a lower dollar tends to occur when things are calm, and in many cases improving. Thus far, we have seen a weak dollar ahead of this election, similar to 1988, 2004, and 2012, and in all those cases, the incumbent party won the election. What makes 2020 so unique is some believe that Biden’s policies, such as more regulation, higher taxes, much higher stimulus, and reduced tariffs, may weaken the US dollar, putting the accuracy of this signal in question, too.
While Biden may be ahead in the polls, there are several clues that this race could be much closer than many are expecting. This could influence the makeup of Congress as well, where a close race may suggest a greater chance of divided government. Early voting suggests a high turnout and high voter interest. A clear winner would have a mandate to govern. Clarity around the issues and policies of the next administration would benefit individuals as they make their investment decisions.
- The views expressed are provided for information only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities or investment products. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you consult your financial advisor.
The economic forecast set forth in this presentation may not develop as predicted, and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful. - Data provided by LPL Stategas Research, Gallup Polls, and Rasmussen.
- All investing involves risk including loss of principal.