With the final tally for India’s election posted, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will succeed to a third term; however, polling forecasts advising that Modi’s party and the alliance it formed would claim a decisive landslide victory has been frustrated by a much stronger-than-expected showing representing the coalition of opposition parties. Poorer regions of the country joined forces to thwart the pro-business agenda underpinning the Modi platform, which was championed by the country’s billionaire class. The surprise electoral setback denied Modi’s Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) the strong majority it needed to conclusively advance economic policies that have underpinned India’s success in attracting both Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and global investor interest, coupled with the prized status of becoming one of the fastest-growing global economies.
Leading up to the election, investors had been rattled by the possibility that a Modi victory could be weakened by a smaller voter turnout or the prospect of winning fewer seats in the lower house of parliament, which would result in muted support for his mandate to drive the economy and investment. Market performance reflected these concerns.
The pro-growth platform espoused by Modi and the BJP coalition included the promise of transitioning India from an “emerging market” to a “developed market,” a theme he referred to in 2022 when he urged Independence Day crowds to think in terms of becoming a developed country within 25 years as his policies would focus on efforts to upgrade infrastructure, power production, defense, and digital technology.
Now, earlier concerns have been realized as to how Modi — the driving force in India’s modernization — will be able to successfully navigate any opposition to move forward with his agenda and hopes for a future “developed” India. The Indian equity market had been struggling leading up to the election as many traders bet against the market out of concern that Modi and the BJP would not secure the kind of compelling victory that would allow the pro-growth approach to continue at a faster pace. Global funds withdrew approximately $3 billion from domestic shares from the start of the year as worries escalated that Modi’s attempt to secure a third term could be thwarted by his platform not receiving enough votes to declare a broad enough mandate for commanding economic growth.
The multi-phase six-week-long election season included Modi’s attempt to reach voters
beyond a business-only platform, which included welfare measures for areas of the country that remain exceedingly poor, and a Hindu-led narrative that found appeal among the wider Indian population despite rising concern from the Muslim minority. But it was not enough, as the stark inequality between Modi’s billionaire supporters and a large swath of the population who earn less than $4 a day became a fundamental — and successful — theme for the opposition.
With expectations that the government would focus on capital expenditures directed towards power generation and infrastructure, utilities edged higher, as did private and state-owned companies associated with the infrastructure buildout. Now analysts are adjusting their expectations as questions about Modi’s ability to forge a budget consensus are questioned. Modi ruled with authority backed by voters and through the force of his dominant personality, and now he’s being forced to work with a multitude of opposition party factions.
Still, most analysts contend it will be difficult to dismantle the reform program, and that a series of checks and balances within the newly formed government could provide the transparency needed for further FDI and global fund inflows. India’s Sensex Index has begun to recover as domestic investors, particularly banks and mutual funds, took advantage of the selloff. Analysts continue to monitor flows from global investors to measure whether they remain convinced that the Modi juggernaut has enough influence to power his agenda. The composition of the new cabinet will provide a significant indication of Modi’s remaining influence.
FDI in India grew at a rapid pace as the Modi administration provided stability and insurance that the pro-business agenda was intact and reliable. The regulatory framework was codified, and endorsements from well-known brands helped bolster support for viewing India as a country hospitable to foreign enterprises.
Although FDI in China withered as its economy stagnated during and after the COVID-19 shutdown, it was mounting concern on President Xi Jinping’s leadership that helped re-direct FDI towards India. Modi’s reform agenda and a comparatively more transparent and stable government offered a viable alternative to China. The expansive Indian market of 1.4 billion people has increasingly been viewed as providing foreign companies with an affordable base for operations and access to a growing consumer market.
The strength in the Indian stock indices represented a clear referendum on the transformation of India within the emerging market complex, and a primary and formidable competitor to China’s domination within emerging markets.
The Indian markets markedly outperformed the Hang Seng Index — which lists mainland China’s shares — but recent efforts by Beijing to restore confidence, and now the perceived weakened stature of Modi’s third term, could favor Chinese shares. Still, the consensus from emerging market analysts continues to favor India while acknowledging the resumption of interest in Chinese companies, even if the Chinese market is seen as a trader’s market.
The latest figures for India’s gross domestic product (GDP) growth, 8.2% for the fiscal year through March, underscores the strength of the economy and the reforms that have been instituted into the economic base.
At the margin, the macroeconomic stability provided by Modi’s leadership should remain and continue at a more temperate pace, but continue, nonetheless. The composition of the cabinet and the upcoming July budget should provide global investors the ability to assess the viability of India’s commanding status within emerging markets.
The economic forecast set forth in this presentation may not develop as predicted, and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.
Data provided by Bloomberg, FactSet, and LPL Financial, tracking #589046.
US Treasuries may be considered “safe haven” investments but do carry some degree of risk including interest rate, credit, and market risk. Bonds are subject to
market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P500) is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability. These risks may be heightened for investments in emerging markets.