The term stagflation has been circulating increasingly in the financial media as inflation readings have risen sharply in recent months. The term is often associated with the 1970s, which saw runaway inflation—largely driven by sky-high energy prices—and lackluster economic growth. Stagflation and a return to the weak equity markets of the 1970s would be scary. However, when looking at the data, we remain skeptical that either runaway inflation or low growth are immediately around the corner, much less at the same time.
One way to gauge stagflation is to calculate what is commonly referred to as the Misery Index—inflation plus unemployment. The Misery Index today is nowhere near the extreme levels of the 1970s. In fact, the level of “misery” is very close to the long-term average of 10%—despite the highest inflation readings we’ve seen in over a decade.
The irony of inflation concerns is that the Federal Reserve has been trying, without success, for the past decade to stimulate inflation to its 2% long-term target. We believe there are several structural considerations at play that have—and will continue to—put downward pressure on prices over the medium to long-term.
Demographics and global trade are two of those considerations. We also believe that more acute price competition is an important variable that can keep prices contained. In our view, the ubiquitous use of the internet has indeed raised the price consciousness of the consumer. It has streamlined the price discovery process and has served to shift the pricing balance of power from producers to consumers. After all, consumers can sift through products, services, and their pricing on their smartphones without leaving their home. Just a decade ago, what consumers could purchase on the internet may have been limited to small-ticket commodity items, electronics, and books. Now the list of goods and services for which consumers can comparison shop includes nearly everything from new vehicles to airline tickets to homes to rent or buy. It is little surprise that inflation has been benign for years, and price pressures could again subside once coronavirus-related supply/demand imbalances run their course.
Much of the runaway inflation case had centered on skyrocketing commodity prices, a valid concern to be sure. However, since May nearly every commodity that was causing alarm has seen a significant decline. Lumber prices? Down more than 70%. Copper prices? Down 15%. Even crop prices such as corn and soybeans have fallen significantly over the past few months. As they often say, the cure for high prices is high prices.
The bond market agrees with the view of transitory inflation. If one was simply looking at recent economic reports or reading media headlines, they might be surprised to realize that the market is not looking for more extreme inflation readings. By looking at the difference between what bond traders pay for inflation-protected Treasuries and plain vanilla nominal Treasuries, you have a good idea of what the market’s expectations for inflation are. Market implied inflation expectations or “breakevens” rose rapidly from extremely low levels last year. However, a funny thing happened after the release of the April Consumer Price Index (CPI) report in early May: inflation expectations fell. And those expectations have continued to fall despite higher subsequent readings. Currently, market participants are estimating inflation to be less than 2.5% annualized over the next five years, more than 30 basis points (0.30%) lower than the expectation in early May.
The other key component of the Misery Index is the unemployment rate, a sort of proxy for growth and economic health. The unemployment rate is not yet back to its pre-pandemic levels, but the most recent jobs report showed that the economy added nearly a million jobs in July, bringing the unemployment rate down to 5.4%. There is potential for further job gains as schools reopen and extensive unemployment benefits expire in early September.
That said, after the boosts from the reopening and stimulus pass, the U.S. economy may resume its prepandemic growth of 2% real gross domestic product (GDP). Bloomberg’s survey of economists points to just 2.3% real GDP growth in 2023 after 4.2% next year. Given the limited population growth in the United States, demographic headwinds as baby boomers retire, low immigration rates, and high public sector debt, the opportunity for stronger economic growth than that may be limited, and that slower growth makes higher inflation all the less likely.
Stagflation is understandably a concern. Low growth and high inflation lead to a situation where most people become poorer in real terms. However, the evidence does not indicate it to be a lasting scenario. While prices are not likely to outright decline and create deflation, recent inflation readings should moderate, helping stocks through the remainder of 2021.
The views expressed are provided for information only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities or investment products. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you consult your financial advisor.
- The economic forecast set forth in this presentation may not develop as predicted, and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.
- Data provided by LPL Financial and FactSet.
- Indexes are unmanaged statistical composites and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance of any investment and do not reflect fees, expenses,